<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucia Di Lammermoor in HD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/</link>
	<description>Comments and reviews of opera, music, and medicine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 04:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicine-opera.com/?p=1649#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to play devil&#039;s advocate and say that everyone who is criticising Zimmerman&#039;s direction WHILST praising Netrebko is an idiot.

I thought the production itself was stunning, the update to the Victorian era worked perfectly, as indeed it was a time when inheritance was still a major social concern for the aristocratic classes. I think it made it more interesting in terms of being staged as a &#039;ghost story&#039;, given Victorian ideas about fallen women, insanity, mental health and the world of spirits.

As for the oft-savaged photographer in the sextet - pure genius. Absolute genius. Having seen it staged that way, I cannot possibly begin to imagine it being done any other way. Everything being sung in that sextet is the internal thought of the character (eg Enrico asking himself why he is so restrained from vengeance) and it makes PERFECT sense that whilst thinking these thoughts, they would be going through the motions of the wedding ceremony. How else do you stage that scene? I have seen it performed with characters just standing and singing to themselves - are we to believe that the action of the wedding just stopped while people became introspective for several minutes? Who cares if it raised laughter from the audience. I wasn&#039;t laughing because it was necessarily funny, I laughed because I thought it was witty, clever and inspired.

Now, how DARE you criticise Mary Zimmerman for that and allow yourselves to praise Netrebko for what was, in reality, a very poor first act. Her singing in the first act was nearly as sharp as the knife she yielded in the third. SNAP!! Give me Natalie Dessay ANYTIME.

Lastly, how about we all get some perspective and stop criticising the way the HD broadcasts are filmed. If you want to see it the way you would see it as an audience member, why not get a god-damned ticket and sit in the audience. I personally LOVE the artistry of the filming, the different angles and perspectives, and the cinematic feeling. I am grateful for the opportunity to see them, I won&#039;t criticise the cinema before I criticise the singers.

Rant completed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to play devil&#8217;s advocate and say that everyone who is criticising Zimmerman&#8217;s direction WHILST praising Netrebko is an idiot.</p>
<p>I thought the production itself was stunning, the update to the Victorian era worked perfectly, as indeed it was a time when inheritance was still a major social concern for the aristocratic classes. I think it made it more interesting in terms of being staged as a &#8216;ghost story&#8217;, given Victorian ideas about fallen women, insanity, mental health and the world of spirits.</p>
<p>As for the oft-savaged photographer in the sextet &#8211; pure genius. Absolute genius. Having seen it staged that way, I cannot possibly begin to imagine it being done any other way. Everything being sung in that sextet is the internal thought of the character (eg Enrico asking himself why he is so restrained from vengeance) and it makes PERFECT sense that whilst thinking these thoughts, they would be going through the motions of the wedding ceremony. How else do you stage that scene? I have seen it performed with characters just standing and singing to themselves &#8211; are we to believe that the action of the wedding just stopped while people became introspective for several minutes? Who cares if it raised laughter from the audience. I wasn&#8217;t laughing because it was necessarily funny, I laughed because I thought it was witty, clever and inspired.</p>
<p>Now, how DARE you criticise Mary Zimmerman for that and allow yourselves to praise Netrebko for what was, in reality, a very poor first act. Her singing in the first act was nearly as sharp as the knife she yielded in the third. SNAP!! Give me Natalie Dessay ANYTIME.</p>
<p>Lastly, how about we all get some perspective and stop criticising the way the HD broadcasts are filmed. If you want to see it the way you would see it as an audience member, why not get a god-damned ticket and sit in the audience. I personally LOVE the artistry of the filming, the different angles and perspectives, and the cinematic feeling. I am grateful for the opportunity to see them, I won&#8217;t criticise the cinema before I criticise the singers.</p>
<p>Rant completed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.J.Ninio</title>
		<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>S.J.Ninio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicine-opera.com/?p=1649#comment-113</guid>
		<description>We have been watching the Met opera performances in a movie theaters.  Lucia De Lammermoor is 3h and 20 minutes long. We went in at 7 PM and got out at 11:30+ PM. People seeing a live performance don&#039;t have to watch more than an hour of unnecessary and non-contributing interviews nor how the stage is being set together with the carepentry noise and then trailers of future operas, Placido Domingo celebration etc etc. All this is in addition to 2 - 20 minutes intermissions.If you have to include these distractions, I suggest, you leave them for after  the end of the opera. If one is interested, he/she can stay, if not, one is free to go home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been watching the Met opera performances in a movie theaters.  Lucia De Lammermoor is 3h and 20 minutes long. We went in at 7 PM and got out at 11:30+ PM. People seeing a live performance don&#8217;t have to watch more than an hour of unnecessary and non-contributing interviews nor how the stage is being set together with the carepentry noise and then trailers of future operas, Placido Domingo celebration etc etc. All this is in addition to 2 &#8211; 20 minutes intermissions.If you have to include these distractions, I suggest, you leave them for after  the end of the opera. If one is interested, he/she can stay, if not, one is free to go home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Kurtzman</title>
		<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Kurtzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicine-opera.com/?p=1649#comment-112</guid>
		<description>For more on Lucia D Lammermoor go here:
http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/10/more-on-lucia-di-lammermoor/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more on Lucia D Lammermoor go here:<br />
<a href="http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/10/more-on-lucia-di-lammermoor/" rel="nofollow">http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/10/more-on-lucia-di-lammermoor/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Richards</title>
		<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>David Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicine-opera.com/?p=1649#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Loved back stage scenes and interviews as did everyone in the cinema I attended.
Hated irritating actions of photographer in the sextet - he almost ruined the whole performance for me.
I hate patronising up-dating. Young people and children love to see sets and costumes appropriate to the time of the drama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved back stage scenes and interviews as did everyone in the cinema I attended.<br />
Hated irritating actions of photographer in the sextet &#8211; he almost ruined the whole performance for me.<br />
I hate patronising up-dating. Young people and children love to see sets and costumes appropriate to the time of the drama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lev</title>
		<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicine-opera.com/?p=1649#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I actually watched this performance live in the Met. I agree on all counts. The photographer intrusion during the sextet was at best irritating. This is one the best pieces of music in the entire opera, making a mockery out of it is unforgivable. On the other hand, Netrebko was absolutely fantastic. I was surprised to read several reviews, characterizing her performance as &quot;disappointing&quot; citing lack of &quot;extreme coloratura fireworks&quot;. Her performance conveyed the drama of the recent murderess losing her sanity like no other. Her pianissimo sounded incredibly reach filled with strength and tenderness. She didn&#039;t show off her vocal power which only added to the drama and realism of the whole mad scene. Frankly, the story of Lucia is quite silly even for the opera standards. Netrebko&#039;s singing was able to make the drama much more believable.

Piotr Beczala&#039;s singing was solid and fine. Overall, I would give him a B+ for too much sliding up to the high notes, and artificially dramatizing passages in his last aria. Not bad, but not perfect. I was really surprised that audience gave a louder ovation to Beczala than to Netrebko who was beyond excellence! Thanks for the lovely review!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually watched this performance live in the Met. I agree on all counts. The photographer intrusion during the sextet was at best irritating. This is one the best pieces of music in the entire opera, making a mockery out of it is unforgivable. On the other hand, Netrebko was absolutely fantastic. I was surprised to read several reviews, characterizing her performance as &#8220;disappointing&#8221; citing lack of &#8220;extreme coloratura fireworks&#8221;. Her performance conveyed the drama of the recent murderess losing her sanity like no other. Her pianissimo sounded incredibly reach filled with strength and tenderness. She didn&#8217;t show off her vocal power which only added to the drama and realism of the whole mad scene. Frankly, the story of Lucia is quite silly even for the opera standards. Netrebko&#8217;s singing was able to make the drama much more believable.</p>
<p>Piotr Beczala&#8217;s singing was solid and fine. Overall, I would give him a B+ for too much sliding up to the high notes, and artificially dramatizing passages in his last aria. Not bad, but not perfect. I was really surprised that audience gave a louder ovation to Beczala than to Netrebko who was beyond excellence! Thanks for the lovely review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hopeful Lily</title>
		<link>http://medicine-opera.com/2009/02/lucia-di-lammermoor-in-hd/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Hopeful Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicine-opera.com/?p=1649#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to find someone else who hates all those backstage bits as much as I do. Even worse is when they have the camera show the singers from behind--breaking the fourth wall so we see the audience, and totally destroying the suspension of disbelief.

The camera work for most of these HD operas has been awkward at best. Too often, we are slammed with close-ups (which you aptly describe above) and have no opportunity to see the interesting staging as it is meant to be seen, as a whole. La Damnation de Faust and Orfeo ed Euridice were both botched.

I enjoyed the vigor of the performances in Lucia, especially the scene in which Edgardo and Enrico are singing full force at each other expressing their intent to kill each other. These singers gave their all.

The last two songs of the opera are my favorites. Beczala did them justice. He may not have the ability to be tender while strong that Pavarotti did, but he was secure with all the notes, and sang his heart out.

The ghosts were silly, and I didn&#039;t even recognize Netrebko as a ghost. Her character is dead then; that scene is supposed to be all about Edgardo, and the ghost was trying to usurp it, so I tried not to look at her.

Maybe syringes were in use in the late 19th century, but dosing Lucia with laudanum would have been more correct for the times.

Even so, the beauty and force of the singing in this HD opera performance made it a winner despite all the interference from the production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to find someone else who hates all those backstage bits as much as I do. Even worse is when they have the camera show the singers from behind&#8211;breaking the fourth wall so we see the audience, and totally destroying the suspension of disbelief.</p>
<p>The camera work for most of these HD operas has been awkward at best. Too often, we are slammed with close-ups (which you aptly describe above) and have no opportunity to see the interesting staging as it is meant to be seen, as a whole. La Damnation de Faust and Orfeo ed Euridice were both botched.</p>
<p>I enjoyed the vigor of the performances in Lucia, especially the scene in which Edgardo and Enrico are singing full force at each other expressing their intent to kill each other. These singers gave their all.</p>
<p>The last two songs of the opera are my favorites. Beczala did them justice. He may not have the ability to be tender while strong that Pavarotti did, but he was secure with all the notes, and sang his heart out.</p>
<p>The ghosts were silly, and I didn&#8217;t even recognize Netrebko as a ghost. Her character is dead then; that scene is supposed to be all about Edgardo, and the ghost was trying to usurp it, so I tried not to look at her.</p>
<p>Maybe syringes were in use in the late 19th century, but dosing Lucia with laudanum would have been more correct for the times.</p>
<p>Even so, the beauty and force of the singing in this HD opera performance made it a winner despite all the interference from the production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

